He’s the World’s Tallest Dog, a Great Dane clocking in at 245 pounds and 7 feet 3 inches ohmigosh when standing on his back legs. They should rent him out for toddlers to ride around a small dirt circle.

Giant George is 4 years old. He eats 110 pounds of food every week. He sleeps in his own king-sized-freaking-bed. Can I have his life?

Great Danes are such beautiful dogs. I’ve always loved the big breeds, but compared to the Irish Wolfhound (the other redonkulously large breed), Great Danes totally win. Look at George up there. Don’t you just want to curl up on a very small portion of a very large sofa with George and watch some TV? That’s the kind of dog you want to hang out with. Irish Wolfhound? Looks like it hunts for human flesh every full moon.

OK, I swear, after this post, I’m done talking about mutts v. purebreds. But I just thought this was too awesome/cute not to share.

You know The View? Where snarky ladies of all ages and background (maybe not ALL, but you gotta give ‘em props for an honorable attempt at inclusiveness, plus I mean, you can’t go wrong with Whoopi Goldberg, let’s be real) come together in the daytime to snark their hearts out all over your TV?

Well these lovely ladies have a soft spot for mutts, and I can totally relate. Last year (also, I believe, around the Westminster Dog show), they hosted the first annual Mutt Show. The Mutt Show is judged by David Fry of the WKC and is divided into two sections. In the first, selected viewers parade their beloved pooches; in the second, we see mutts that are up for adoption at the North Shore Animal League America. What a great way to get people interested and involved in adopting pets!

The videos I could find of this year’s Mutt Show were sort of low-quality (but check them out here). Here’s video of the 2009 Mutt Show’s Viewer segment, in which Starr Jones calls the Westminster Kennel Club bitchy. LOVE IT.

“Room for Debate” at NYTimes is a commentary blog which allows outside contributors to post their stances on a particular current issue. With the dog show and PETA’s cockamamie protest on my mind (and as someone who’s owned both mutts and purebred dogs), I was glad to stumble upon this edition: Feeling Guilty About Your Purebred Dog?

They really did a fine job getting people to speak from across the board: there’s a case for purebreds (the predictability of personality traits inherent to a breed increases chances that the dog will be a good match for the owner and thus not end up in a shelter) and a case for mutts (many pure breed puppies come from exploitative breeders who perpetuate genetic deficiencies; mutts come with built-in “hybrid vigor”). But to be honest, the statement that took an entirely different approach was the one that really struck home for me.

Ted Kerasote’s “Assigning Blame is Hard to Do” takes the stance that in this debate, we’re not looking at the real issues: careless breeding and an outdated, inefficient shelter system. Kerasote points out that striving for a specific appearance through drawing from a small gene pool has compromised breeds’ genetic health (e.g. 60% of Goldies in the US die of cancer). He goes on to say that the way our shelter system is currently run, with inconvenient hours and a lack of proactive community involvement, it’s no wonder that more dogs aren’t getting adopted (and are euthanized instead).

Protesters interrupt Sadie's victory march.

Two PETA protesters (thankfully not dressed in KKK regalia) held up signs that said, “Mutts Rule” and “Breeders Kill Shelter Dogs’ Chances.” While I would agree that mutts totally rule, is it really necessary to put all this heat on breeders and others who love a specific make and model? Kerasote wraps up his statement beautifully:

Assigning blame to one or the other won’t do much to bring more genetic diversity into the world of purebred dogs or help shelters operate in more diverse and life-saving ways. Nor does instigating guilt give the slightest nod toward the magic that happens when a person and a dog, purebred or not, fall in love.

Amen, brother.

AP Photo / Henry Ray Abrams

In case you missed it, here’s the video of Best in Show from the Westminster Dog Show. The winner was that super cuteness in the picture, a Scottish terrier named Sadie. She was the favorite from the start–and this is her 112th Best in Show! When do they just give you a lifetime supply of Milk Bars and call it a day?

Every time I watch a dog show, I imagine what it must feel like to have someone looking at your teeth or pretending they’re gonna give something you really want to eat and then pretending to eat it themselves just so you won’t lose interest in it. I don’t know how they’re so patiently standing through all that. I would lose my mind in that ring. I’d be all, “Pretend to eat that cookie again, and I swear I will bite off your hand.”

But they’re totally Zen. One with the cookie. Be one with the cookie. Om.

Dog-induced Buddhism aside, PETA’s gripe with the Westminster Dog Kennel isn’t their total popping of pooch’s personal bubbles, it’s that “the American Kennel Club promotes pure-breeding of dogs that is harmful to their health.” Protesters stood outside Madison Square Garden yesterday dressed… are you sitting down?… in KKK costumes. From the Gothamist,

PETA spokesman Michael McGraw admits “it’s an uncomfortable comparison,” but he insists the AKC is trying to create a “master race” (not to mention breeding while adorable mutts overflow the shelters)

I’m sorry… Uncomfortable comparison? It is a little more than uncomfortable, bro, it’s the KK-freaking-K. PETA’s tactics bother me on many different levels. I just don’t like them. This doesn’t make it any better. Although Jen Carlson’s totally got a point in her parenthetical there. Why get a poodle or a dobie when you could stop on down at your local shelter and choose a dog that is all the best parts of a poodle and a dobie and a Frenchie AND a Scottie!

If you needed another excuse to consider your dog basically human, here it is: Puppy Tweets.

Despite my initial hesitance to hop on the Twitter Train, I’ll admit now that online social networking is one of the most genius things ever to come out of a bored, nerdy college kid’s Friday night. But a toy that updates Twitter on behalf of your dog?

Sure, maybe that WOULD be cool if it could actually tell you that your pooch watches TV all day while you’re gone and loves his walker (all NYC Pooches would totally tweet about how awesome their walkers are), but the responses are canned and random: “”I finally caught that tail I’ve been chasing, and . . . OOUUUCHH!” could be triggered by running or barking. The article compares it to a Magic 8 Ball, and that seems about right. Except a Magic 8 Ball is way cooler.

Executives at the nation’s largest toy maker aren’t concerned that the toy’s pre-written tweets could grow tiresome, saying Puppy Tweets is intended to be more entertaining than high-tech.

OK, sure. So maybe Puppy Tweets can’t tell you exactly what your dog is doing in a given moment and rubbing his butt on the carpet could translate to, “Throw the ball!” And it does have 500 tweets to deliver, so there’s no immediate danger of repetition/ensuing boredom.

But… Pre-fab tweets that are only nominally connected to your dog’s actual movement/sound just doesn’t seem to be as awesome as it could be. You might as well make a Twitter for your pooch and update it yourself. You know, for real. You could even pretend it came from Fido, if it helps.

Now, I do kind of feel like I’m missing something. This just doesn’t seem like a neat thing to me, even if it is just a toy. And I personally have this pesky little habit of thinking of my dog as a dog. I know that’s not everyone’s cup of tea, and I’m all about massive amounts of pretty obsessive love being given to our furry friends. But until something comes out that can give me at least an approximation of what my dog is thinking, I’m not all that interested in Fido’s tweets.

Besides, notes from your NYC Pooch walker are way better updates on your dog’s day, and we are JUST as cute.

I bet if you’ve ever been to Brooklyn’s Park Slope, you were met with tree-lined streets and happy families wheeling their 2.5 kids around in strollers. You’d probably think it’s a pretty safe neighborhood, wouldn’t you? Well you’d be wrong!

From WPIX.com, a story about a woman whose 10-year-old Westie was straight up mugged for his coat while he was tied to a pole outside of a grocery store. The owner, Donna McPherson, went into the store to buy some milk and came out to a naked, cold, sad-lookin’ pooch.

In the video, McPherson exclaims, “It’s ludicrous!” and, well, that’s about all I can come up with too. What’s that scenario look like? Person walks down the street, sees poor little Lexie the Westie sporting a stylish green coat, thinks, “My little Bruno would look SMASHING in that!” and — this is Park Slope we’re talking about, y’all, Brooklyn’s most family-friendly… ghetto? — jacks the coat off the Westie and books it down the street. Lu. Di. Crous.

The article mentions that police have no leads to the puppy robber. Really, NYPD?! I don’t care how many home invasions or bank robberies or murders or whatever you’ve got to look out for, there is a puppy short one cute green coat out there. Some things just make you want to cry.

In other news, a 19-year-old from California fended off a mountain lion with his pit bull/German shepherd mix and… a ninja sword.

Don’t leave home without it… Especially if you turn your back on your pooch in Park Slope.**

**”Employees at Ace Supermarket were shocked about the doggie mugging, and insist the neighborhood is typically safe for mutts and humans alike.”

Well, it’s finally happened. The Snuggie, a blanket with arms/a robe worn backwards/the greatest joke ever played on the American television shopper, now comes sized for pooches. The video above is their TV spot, a brilliant testament to advertising’s ability to convince you to buy just about anything.

So what’s so awesome about the Snuggie that distinguishes it from other doggy clothes? Well, it’s a blanket. With… arms. So now even Fluffy can romp in the yard, stripped of his final shred of dignity.

If you call now, you’ll get not one but TWO Snuggie Dogs, and what’s more–a talking dog tag! If your little one gets lost, its dog tag can play a message that sounds something like this: “Hi. My name is Fluffy. PLEASE TAKE THIS BLANKET OFF OF ME AND FOR THE LOVE OF GOD DON’T BRING ME BACK THERE.”

So call now, and for only $14.95, you too can turn your pooch into a hollow shell of the dog he once was.

Hi, folks!

Sorry for the lack of posting last week. But it’s Monday all over again, and posting will resume as normal starting… NOW!

Halloween is a couple of weeks behind us, but we just got in some awesome and adorable pictures of a few of our very own NYC Pooches in their costumes, so check them out! Click the link below Jackie the Pirate Pooch for more dressed up doggies.

Yarrrrr!

Read the rest of this entry »

Dear Doggy Bloggers,

We have something patently freaking ridiculous for you this morning. It is so ridiculous, I’m not sure there are any words that can adequately capture its purity, its spirit, its particular brand of beauty and…. OK it’s actually kind of creepy. Just watch.

Now what in the world do you think of THAT?

I’ve always had a deep appreciation for service dogs. They’re amazing–not only do they provide companionship to those who need it most, they freakin’ save lives on the regular.

NYTimes.com had an article last week about dogs’ intelligence. It opens with an introduction to Jet, a labradoodle service dog who can detect oncoming seizures, panic attacks, and even dropping blood sugar. He’s been trained to stare at his owner until she recognizes the problem. He’ll drop a toy in her lap to snap her out of a funk. He’ll put his body right under her head to cushion her if she has a seizure. He sounds pretty darn smart.

The article goes on to question our perception of doggie smarts, citing examples from both sides of the scientific research:

By giving dogs language learning and other tests devised for infants and toddlers, Dr. Coren [a psychology professor at the University of British Columbia] has come up with an intelligence ranking of 100 breeds, with border collies at No. 1. He says the most intelligent breeds (poodles, retrievers, Labradors and shepherds) can learn as many as 250 words, signs and signals, while the others can learn 165. The average dog is about as intellectually advanced as a 2- to 2-and-a-half-year-old child, he has concluded. [Emphasis mine.]

So there ya go! Border collie owners, congrats on having a wickedly smart pooch… Who is really only as smart as a 2 year old? Wait a minute, that doesn’t seem right…

Clive D. L. Wynne, an associate professor of psychology at the University of Florida [...] argues that it is dogs’ deep sensitivity to the humans around them, their obedience under rigorous training, and their desire to please that can explain most of these capabilities. They may be deft at reading human cues — and teachable — but that doesn’t mean they are thinking like people, he says.

That makes a little more sense to me. Dogs will go to the ends of the earth for their owners, which is why we love them so very much, among other reasons… But is that all? Dogs are just eager to please and nothing else?

Reader Alice Laby sent in a letter to the editor that hits the nail on the head, as far as I’m concerned.

As we know, dogs are highly intelligent animals. But to compare their intelligence to human intelligence is to do dogs a disservice.

As we live in closer proximity to dogs than ever before, we are learning that they can be of service to humans in many ways, as your article mentions. But to say, as some researchers have, that a dog has the intelligence of an average 2-year-old child is missing the point and purpose of advanced service dog training.

I’m sure many 2-year-old children are smarter than dogs in human terms, but can a 2-year-old human child detect seizures or onset of depression in a family member? They cannot, and most adult humans cannot either.

Let research continue to promote ways that animals can help humans lead healthy lives, using the animals’ own brand of intelligence.

Right on, Alice! Dogs might work hard for their owners’ love and affection and praise, but to reduce their actions exclusively to that need just seems a little short-sighted.

But I’m a dog-lover, so I totally would say that, jeez…